Ned Freed wrote:
Now, if at some point in the future, after this group is done and has "walked
into absence", it makes sense to reuse some or alll of DKIM to provide some of
these other services in lieu of using S/MIME, PGP or whatever, that's fine.
Incremental development is A Good Thing. But we need to focus on a problem
that's just large enough to provide sufficient utility for deployment but not
so large it causes confusion and hesitation. Finding this balance isn't easy,
but I think the current proposals are very close.
Which current proposal do you find very close, the one with or the one
without SSP or are you saying that's true of either one?
Scott Kitterman
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org