william(at)elan.net wrote:
1. It changes the originator entirely to From and now instead
of using Sender header field value (as per RFC2822) to
decide cases of multiple From addresses, the first one in
From header field is used?
That would be a step backwards, with more than one From address
there must be a single Sender address. Not necessarily one of
the From-addresses, it can be even different from the envelope.
3. It makes recommendation that mail lists add Sender header
field:
That sounds like some Sender-ID or 2476bis 8.1 magic. Without
a statement how to handle any existing Sender it's messy, and
combined with Resent-* it's probably beyond repair.
say "header field"
Even the last pocket of resistance (= USEFOR) gave up on this
one, "header field " it is :-|
Bye, Frank
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org