----- Original Message -----
From: "wayne" <wayne(_at_)schlitt(_dot_)net>
To: "IETF DKIM WG" <ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org>
Tony Hansen mentioned this in the BoF Jabber session, and it is
something that I have long thought also.
Would it be better to change the o= values to be words instead of
single letters? I find the letters to not be very mnemonic and I
don't think we are that short on space.
That's a great idea! Talking in symbols is fun, but my APL days is long
over. :-)
Do you have any suggestions for terms? I've seen these floating around for
the last 3-4 months:
SSP Policies:
NONE (no policy [1])
o=? WEAK (signature optional, no third party, see [2])
o=~ NEUTRAL (signature optional, 3rd party allowed)
o=- STRONG (signature required, 3rd party allowed)
o=! EXCLUSIVE (signature required, no 3rd party)
o=. NEVER (no mail expected)
o=^ USER
[1} a NONE policy is possible where there is no declaration for a SSP.
[2] Arvel suggested another policy called WEAK which satisfies a
signature optional but not allowing 3rd party signers.
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org