In <43714276(_dot_)5B52(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> Frank Ellermann
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> writes:
o mnemonic mail signature 3rd party your
NONE other n/a n/a #1
. NEVER never n/a n/a #8
^ USER maybe other n/a #9
maybe never n/a #2
? WEAK maybe maybe never #4
~ NEUTRAL maybe maybe maybe #5
! EXCLUSIVE maybe always never #6
- STRONG maybe always maybe #7
Personally, I really don't much like the "WEAK", "EXCLUSIVE",
"STRONG", etc. mnemonics. I guess they try to describe the quality of
the policy, rather than decribe the function that they create. I
think decribing the function would be better. I also think that the
descriptions of the policies aren't particularly clear. For example,
I could see many people considering "WEAK" to be a stronger policy
than "STRONG" because it excludes third party signatures.
I think breaking them out into at least two keywords will lead to
clearer names.
-wayne
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org