(Reducing distribution to just ietf-dkim)
On 2006-01-03 13:46, Jim Fenton wrote:
For this reason, I don't think the operation of reputation systems
themselves should be defined by IETF; different users will have
different needs.
Trying to define what is intrinsically a social policy using purely
technological means pretty much always fails -- and generates a lot of
pointless arguments along the way.
Nobody with any real-world mail operations experience wants a
not-yet-chartered working group to tell them how or when to apply
reputation, so any attempt to do so will fail miserably. But, that
failure doesn't need to drag DKIM down with it.
Can we just agree that DKIM may be used as an input to site-specific
reputation systems and MOVE ON already?
--
J.D. Falk, Anti-Spam Product Manager
Yahoo! Communications Platform Team
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org