Great. Will this also work with other (i.e. non-list) forms of
forwarding?
I can't see why not particularly if:
the mere presence of a signature does not imply anything more than
taking responsibility for what emanates from that domain.
If Mike is saying that explicitness is necessary, then I think that
gels with Wietse.
I'm sorry Mark, this is a bit too terse for my semantic analyzer.
I take that as a complement on this list ...
-base
just says
"this is what I claim passed through me". -ssp requires a binding
between the
From: address (sender:? listId:?) and the i= to validate the policy binding,
if any.
Maybe it's just that I'm confused about what's being asked here.
Right. So the question is, can a signature be constructed such that it
doesn't interact with SSP to infer a binding above and beyond "I claim
it passed through me"?
Mark.
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org