Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful

At 11:29 PM +0000 3/21/06, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> This is not a gratuitous change since there are folks who
> believe it offers sufficient advantage.
Exactly. People have listed multiple good results from the proposal. 
So far, the only negative result is that people who have written 
software to the -00 draft will have to change it.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html