Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful

> In short, I'm in favor of this change.
>
> Or perhaps I should have just said "me too".

"me too".

--
Arvel


_______________________________________________

NOTE WELL: This list operates according tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, (continued) Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Michael Thomas Message not available Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Mark Delany Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, william(at)elan.net Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Jim Fenton Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Eric Allman Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Russ Housley Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Arvel Hathcock <= Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Arvel Hathcock Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Arvel Hathcock Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Dave Crocker