ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful

2006-03-23 02:31:44
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, william(at)elan.net allegedly wrote:

Its nice to see you finally come around and adapting further META 
signing structure
...

of course you will probably never admit where this is all coming
from ...

Of course we will. The idea is merely a variant of Content-MD5.

What Meta-whatever-it-is has to do with that admission I do not
know. Are you suggesting that Content-MD5 derived from Meta-whatever?


Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html