Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
I am not really bothered by the direct mail use case. They have
infrastructure support.
But mailing lists are a different matter. Mailing lists are typically run on
pensioned off hardware. Delays can already be an issue. The issue is not so
much signature time, it is messaging architecture. Most code deals with the
head and the body separately. This creates a dependency I would like to
avoid.
I'm having a real hard time understanding this. I run a few mailing
lists, and as far as I can tell DKIM as in -allman-01 works fine,
and wouldn't be helped at all by this proposal.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html