Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - Sender Signing [Policy | Practice

Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - Sender Signing [Policy | Practice | Profile] or DSP - Domain Signature Profile

2006-03-24 11:02:45

> If there is going to be a SSP renaming consideration, may I suggest
> "Profile" instead of Practice?

Another possibility is "Preferences" maybe?

--
Arvel


_______________________________________________

NOTE WELL: This list operates according tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] DKIM Working Group Summary, IETF 65, DKIM Chair Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Working Group Summary, IETF 65, Hector Santos [ietf-dkim] SSP - Sender Signing [Policy \| Practice \| Profile] or DSP - Domain Signature Profile, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - Sender Signing [Policy \| Practice \| Profile] or DSP - Domain Signature Profile, Arvel Hathcock <= Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - Sender Signing [Policy \| Practice \| Profile] or DSP - Domain Signature Profile, Jim Fenton Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - Sender Signing [Policy \| Practice \| Profile] or DSP - Domain Signature Profile, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - Sender Signing [Policy \| Practice \| Profile] or DSP - Domain Signature Profile, Jim Fenton Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - Sender Signing [Policy \| Practice \| Profile] or DSP - Domain Signature Profile, Arvel Hathcock Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Working Group Summary, IETF 65, Barry Leiba