On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 10:45:31PM -0500, Tony Hansen allegedly wrote:
As promised at the dkim meeting, I'm resending a suggestion about o=
that was sent in November and again in February.
At the Wednesday meeting, it was suggested that we replace the single
character o=? (etc.) tags with tags like o=WEAK (etc.). The thrust of
the messages was that we should use something that is even more meaningful.
One question Tony. Are you assuming that TXT will remain as the only
Policy/Practice retrieval mechanism? If a new RR is eventually
described, does that obviate the need to anglicize the current format?
Or does that depend on when "eventually" is?
Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html