ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SSP RR vs TXT [was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and o= values]

2006-03-28 10:47:51

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Tony Hansen wrote:

So it sounds like their database *will* support the additional RR
values, it's just that they don't make it easy to use them.

Until they get their standard interface fixed, it sounds like Microsoft
(or a 3rd party) could provide an alternative interface that
additionally stored the RRs in a separate database that would survive
the reboot, and included a service that ran at boot time that would
reload those additional RRs into the real database.

Please correct me if I'm misunderstanding something here.

Yes, this is fairly close to how I remember it from discussions on MARID.
MS folks there were a lot more concerned about their proxy server
(I called it firewall in previous message which is not quite so).

--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html