ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures

2006-03-31 16:23:10
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 02:25:49PM -0800, 
ned+dkim(_at_)mauve(_dot_)mrochek(_dot_)com allegedly wrote:

And let's please not forget that even if this got fixed tomorrow the amount of
time it takes to significantly deploy new MTA versions is very long - far
longer than we can afford to wait.

I'm confused. We expect wide-spread use of this protocol without
deploying new MTAs? That's quite the feat.


Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>