Michael Thomas wrote:
Stephen Farrell wrote:
Folks,
Can you go through the issues list [1] and check that it matches
your concept of where we are with the base document.
In order to get a WG last call on this document soon, we're
going to have to start closing these one-by-one.
In particular, if there are ones that can already be closed
can you say so on the list. I don't think Eliot's checked
against the latest base draft though he has updated the issue
detail to reflect list discussion.
Stephen -- many of these are closed, but you have to look at Eliot's
capture of the discussions inside the ticket. I haven't gone through
every one, but there hasn't been much discussion to the contrary from
the meeting in Dallas.
Yes. I'm asking that folks do that for the ones they know/care about
and let us know if there are any discrepancies or else confirm
that the resolution of such-and-such an issue is in fact applied
in the current I-D.
Eliot has been understandably reluctant to CLOSE issues, but
has generally marked them as ACCEPTED pending confirmation that
consensus text has appeared in the I-D.
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html