Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains


Does anyone else share Doug's belief that these are serious
problems? If so, please you speak up now.

If no-one does, then we do have a pretty clear WG consensus
IMO.

Stephen.

_______________________________________________

NOTE WELL: This list operates according tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Jim Fenton Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, John R Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, John R Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Stephen Farrell <= Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Barry Leiba Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Steve Atkins Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Paul Hoffman Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Paul Hoffman Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, william(at)elan.net Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Dave Crocker