Arvel Hathcock wrote:
10. The Protocol MUST NOT be required to be invoked if a
valid first party signature is found.
Hector, doesn’t it say exactly what you want it to say? It says that the protocol must not require invocation when valid first party signatures are found. It doesn't say "THOU SHALT NOT INVOKE THE PROTOCOL". I see nothing that needs to be changed.
Exactly.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html