IETF DKIM (date)
September 29, 2006
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: open jabber issue: ssp-requirements-01 //designation, Bill.Oxley, 09:56
- [ietf-dkim] Re: open jabber issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Req. forDoes Not Send, Frank Ellermann, 09:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] open jabber issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Req. forDoes Not Send, Damon, 09:08
- RE: [ietf-dkim] open jabber issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Req. forDoes Not Send, Bill.Oxley, 09:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegation and Designation (#1360), william(at)elan.net, 07:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegation and Designation (#1360), Scott Kitterman, 06:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] open jabber issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Req. for Does Not Send, Stephen Farrell, 02:51
- [ietf-dkim] Quick summary of sep 28th jabber, Stephen Farrell, 02:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegation and Designation (#1360), Stephen Farrell, 02:27
September 26, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC 4686 on Analysis of Threats Motivating DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM), Stephen Farrell, 23:42
- [ietf-dkim] RFC 4686 on Analysis of Threats Motivating DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM), rfc-editor, 18:05
- RE: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Arvel Hathcock, 16:36
- [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Stephen Farrell, 16:27
- RE: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP -Suggestion to Remove this., Bill.Oxley, 15:16
- RE: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Arvel Hathcock, 15:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Michael Thomas, 13:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP -Suggestion to Remove this., Hector Santos, 13:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Wietse Venema, 13:17
- RE: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Arvel Hathcock, 11:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Hector Santos, 11:10
- [ietf-dkim] Re: New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Frank Ellermann, 10:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Damon, 10:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Damon, 10:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Stephen Farrell, 10:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Stephen Farrell, 10:16
- [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Hector Santos, 09:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Stephen Farrell, 08:43
September 22, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Suggested text for more intuitive parameter descriptors, Frank Ellermann, 16:39
- [ietf-dkim] Re: jabber problems, Frank Ellermann, 16:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Negative Commentary corrections, Michael Thomas, 16:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: jabber problems, Stephen Farrell, 15:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Negative Commentary corrections, Michael Thomas, 14:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Michael Thomas, 13:37
- [ietf-dkim] Re: jabber problems, John L, 12:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Old issue: What is the role of SSP?, Hector Santos, 12:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Dave Crocker, 10:31
- Re: jabber problems (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Definition of "DKIM Signer Complete"), John Levine, 10:07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Old issue: What is the role of SSP?, Arvel Hathcock, 09:45
- [ietf-dkim] Suggested text for more intuitive parameter descriptors, Arvel Hathcock, 09:20
- [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue, Frank Ellermann, 08:06
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Jabber server?, Frank Ellermann, 07:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue, Damon, 07:11
- [ietf-dkim] Re: New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Frank Ellermann, 06:46
- [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue, Frank Ellermann, 05:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Old issue: What is the role of SSP?, Hector Santos, 05:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Old issue: What is the role of SSP?, Hector Santos, 04:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Stephen Farrell, 03:45
- jabber problems (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Definition of "DKIM Signer Complete"), Stephen Farrell, 03:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Old issue: What is the role of SSP?, Stephen Farrell, 03:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] quick summary of Sep 21 jabber, Stephen Farrell, 01:34
September 21, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] Old issue: What is the role of SSP?, John Levine, 21:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Michael Thomas, 17:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue, Michael Thomas, 16:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Michael Thomas, 16:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Dave Crocker, 16:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Michael Thomas, 16:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5} {3.5}, Hector Santos, 16:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5} {3.5}, Tim Draegen, 15:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5} {3.5}, J.D. Falk, 14:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5} {3.5}, Steve Atkins, 13:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5} {3.5}, Hector Santos, 13:46
- RE: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5} {3.5}, Bill.Oxley, 13:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5} {3.5}, Tim Draegen, 12:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Definition of "DKIM Signer Complete", Damon, 12:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Michael Thomas, 11:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Michael Thomas, 11:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Michael Thomas, 10:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Dave Crocker, 10:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Michael Thomas, 10:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Dave Crocker, 10:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Dave Crocker, 10:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Michael Thomas, 10:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Michael Thomas, 10:13
- [ietf-dkim] quick summary of Sep 21 jabber, Stephen Farrell, 09:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber server?, Stephen Farrell, 09:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Michael Thomas, 08:22
- RE: [ietf-dkim] New Issue 5.3 we never send mail, Bill.Oxley, 08:02
- [ietf-dkim] New issue: Definition of "DKIM Signer Complete", Arvel Hathcock, 07:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Dave Crocker, 07:15
- [ietf-dkim] Jabber server problem..., Stephen Farrell, 05:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue, Eliot Lear, 03:24
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue, Frank Ellermann, 02:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM issues, Stephen Farrell, 01:39
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM issues, Eliot Lear, 01:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP?, Dave Crocker, 01:05
- [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Negative Commentary corrections, Frank Ellermann, 00:18
September 20, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Frank Ellermann, 23:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Designated Signing Domain Scenario missing, Jim Fenton, 23:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Jim Fenton, 23:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Jim Fenton, 23:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP?, Jim Fenton, 22:48
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Generic requirements for SSP, v1., Dave Crocker, 20:09
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Dave Crocker, 20:00
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Discover "requirement", Dave Crocker, 19:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Tim Draegen, 16:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP?, Dave Crocker, 14:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Stephen Farrell, 13:47
- RE: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP?, Bill.Oxley, 12:32
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Clarity among the usage scenarios, Dave Crocker, 10:52
- [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP?, Dave Crocker, 10:38
September 19, 2006
- {Blocked Content} [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, 16:02
- [ietf-dkim] Jabber meeting Thursday 1500 UTC, Stephen Farrell, 15:40
- [ietf-dkim] Re: tracker/jabber info, Frank Ellermann, 15:24
- [ietf-dkim] Re: requrements-01// security concerns regarding policy domain designations rather than delegations, Frank Ellermann, 15:13
- [ietf-dkim] tracker/jabber info, Tim Draegen, 15:09
- [ietf-dkim] Re: requrements-01// security concerns regarding policy domain designations rather than delegations, Frank Ellermann, 13:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: requrements-01// security concerns regarding policy domain designations rather than delegations, Stephen Farrell, 11:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: requrements-01// security concerns regarding policy domain designations rather than delegations, Stephen Farrell, 11:39
September 13, 2006
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP=FAILURE DETECTION), J.D. Falk, 11:24
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Jeff Macdonald, 05:58
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re:[ietf-dkim]SSP=FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos, 04:40
September 12, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Preventing spoofs without breaking SMTP, Hector Santos, 23:15
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP=FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos, 22:56
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), J.D. Falk, 11:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 11:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 11:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Thomas A. Fine, 11:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 11:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, John L, 11:03
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Arvel Hathcock, 10:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Michael Thomas, 10:53
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Arvel Hathcock, 10:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 10:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Hector Santos, 10:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, John Levine, 10:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 10:29
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 10:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Thomas A. Fine, 09:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 09:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Damon, 07:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Michael Thomas, 07:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Michael Thomas, 07:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Graham Murray, 03:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 02:25
September 11, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] Reputation vs SSP, Hector Santos, 22:17
- [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Frank Ellermann, 22:11
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), John Levine, 21:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Scott Kitterman, 21:36
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Scott Kitterman, 21:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Steve Atkins, 21:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Hector Santos, 21:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Steve Atkins, 21:04
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Steve Atkins, 20:46
- [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Frank Ellermann, 20:46
- [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Frank Ellermann, 20:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Steve Atkins, 20:20
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Scott Kitterman, 20:19
- [ietf-dkim] Using Reputation with DKIM-BASE - Its really not out of scope., Hector Santos, 20:19
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Scott Kitterman, 20:16
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Steve Atkins, 19:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Hector Santos, 19:28
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos, 19:26
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos, 19:12
- [ietf-dkim] Relaxed always (was: user level ssp), Frank Ellermann, 19:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Steve Atkins, 18:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Hector Santos, 18:42
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), J.D. Falk, 18:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Scott Kitterman, 18:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Scott Kitterman, 18:11
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos, 17:59
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos, 17:15
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Thomas A. Fine, 14:05
- accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION), J.D. Falk, 13:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Steve Atkins, 13:38
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Bill.Oxley, 13:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 13:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Thomas A. Fine, 13:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, wayne, 13:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, J.D. Falk, 12:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Hector Santos, 12:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Hector Santos, 12:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Stephen Farrell, 12:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Stephen Farrell, 12:15
- [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Thomas A. Fine, 12:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 11:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Thomas A. Fine, 11:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] we don't know what SSP means, Jim Fenton, 11:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Damon, 11:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 11:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Thomas A. Fine, 08:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 07:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hector Santos, 06:59
- [ietf-dkim] SSP Policies and SSP-02 Comments, Hector Santos, 06:59
September 10, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] we don't know what SSP means, Stephen Farrell, 13:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hector Santos, 12:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] we don't know what SSP means, Michael Thomas, 09:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] we don't know what SSP means, Dave Crocker, 09:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] we don't know what SSP means, Stephen Farrell, 07:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] we don't know what SSP means, John Levine, 06:40
September 09, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 20:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Scott Kitterman, 18:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 16:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 16:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, william(at)elan.net, 14:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, Jeff Macdonald, 14:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, Dave Crocker, 13:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, Scott Kitterman, 12:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 12:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 12:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 12:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, John Levine, 12:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 12:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, wayne, 12:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Wietse Venema, 12:04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Bill.Oxley, 12:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 12:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, wayne, 12:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, wayne, 12:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Dave Crocker, 12:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Wietse Venema, 12:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Scott Kitterman, 12:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 12:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Dave Crocker, 12:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, John Levine, 12:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, John Levine, 12:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Scott Kitterman, 12:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, Scott Kitterman, 12:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, wayne, 12:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Michael Thomas, 12:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 12:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 12:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Scott Kitterman, 12:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, Steve Atkins, 11:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Dave Crocker, 11:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, Scott Kitterman, 11:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Steve Atkins, 11:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, Scott Kitterman, 11:46
- [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 11:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, Scott Kitterman, 11:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 11:46
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:46
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, John L, 11:45
- [ietf-dkim] Sign it all, publish the policy, and trust the policy., Thomas A. Fine, 11:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 11:45
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, Arvel Hathcock, 11:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Dave Crocker, 11:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, John L, 11:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, John Levine, 11:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Michael Thomas, 11:43
- [ietf-dkim] house analogy, Dave Crocker, 11:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, Scott Kitterman, 11:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 11:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, John Levine, 11:42
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Arvel Hathcock, 11:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 11:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Scott Kitterman, 11:42
September 07, 2006
- Re: tree walking (was - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), Jim Fenton, 15:40
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 14:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: user level ssp, J.D. Falk, 14:13
- Self-assertion of...well, anything at all (was Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), J.D. Falk, 14:09
- [ietf-dkim] Re: user level ssp, Frank Ellermann, 13:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, John Levine, 13:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Steve Atkins, 13:41
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:13
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 13:09
- Re: tree walking (was - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), william(at)elan.net, 13:01
- [ietf-dkim] Algortihm transitions, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Steve Atkins, 12:44
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:37
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Jon Callas, 12:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 12:27
- [ietf-dkim] Re: user level ssp, Frank Ellermann, 11:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, John Levine, 11:28
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Arvel Hathcock, 10:47
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 10:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp (let me review), Thomas A. Fine, 10:25
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Bill.Oxley, 10:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, John L, 09:31
- Re: tree walking (was - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), Jim Fenton, 09:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Jim Fenton, 09:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Jim Fenton, 09:23
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:22
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Dave Crocker, 09:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Michael Thomas, 08:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Michael Thomas, 08:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Michael Thomas, 08:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Dave Crocker, 08:13
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Bill.Oxley, 08:01
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 07:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Wietse Venema, 07:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 07:12
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Wietse Venema, 04:30
September 06, 2006
- RE: tree walking (was - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), Bill.Oxley, 21:52
- RE: tree walking (was - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:45
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Wietse Venema, 18:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Wietse Venema, 17:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, John Levine, 17:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Wietse Venema, 16:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 16:45
- Re: tree walking (was - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), Jim Fenton, 16:21
- tree walking (was - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), william(at)elan.net, 16:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Jim Fenton, 15:51
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:29
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Bill.Oxley, 15:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, J.D. Falk, 14:30
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:27
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, J.D. Falk, 14:01
- [ietf-dkim] Requirement to explain Resent-* (was: Additional per user policy requirments), Frank Ellermann, 13:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Damon, 11:47
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:53
- [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Michael Thomas, 10:17
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:00
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, william(at)elan.net, 09:19
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, Damon, 08:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, Scott Kitterman, 07:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, Damon, 07:12
September 05, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, Frank Ellermann, 20:38
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Feature matrix, Frank Ellermann, 19:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Policy vs Practices, Scott Kitterman, 10:46
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Policy vs Practices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Policy vs Practices, Hector Santos, 09:28
- [ietf-dkim] Policy vs Practices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:01
- [ietf-dkim] Feature matrix, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:50