ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

[ietf-dkim] Suggested text for more intuitive parameter descriptors

2006-09-22 09:20:30
- 1201/1217 were the same. Arvel volunteered to write a
requirements-like sentence to the effect that human-friendly 
syntax is nicer and whenever that sentence is agreed we add 
it and CLOSE these

How about this (this doesn't need to be too wordy):

"Expectations MUST be presented in the Protocol syntax using as intuitive a 
descriptor as possible.  For example, p=! would be better represented as 
p=strict."

Is this ok?

-- 
Arvel 




_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>