IETF DKIM (thread)

Re: [ietf-dkim] open jabber issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Req. for Does Not Send, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/29
- RE: [ietf-dkim] open jabber issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Req. forDoes Not Send, Bill.Oxley, 2006/09/29
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] open jabber issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Req. forDoes Not Send, Damon, 2006/09/29
  - [ietf-dkim] Re: open jabber issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Req. forDoes Not Send, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/29
    - RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: open jabber issue: ssp-requirements-01 //designation, Bill.Oxley, 2006/09/29
[ietf-dkim] Quick summary of sep 28th jabber, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/29
[ietf-dkim] Delegation and Designation (#1360), Jim Fenton, 2006/09/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegation and Designation (#1360), John Levine, 2006/09/28
- Message not available
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegation and Designation (#1360), Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/29
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegation and Designation (#1360), william(at)elan.net, 2006/09/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegation and Designation (#1360), Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/29
[ietf-dkim] RFC 4686 on Analysis of Threats Motivating DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM), rfc-editor, 2006/09/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC 4686 on Analysis of Threats Motivating DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM), Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/26
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC 4686 on Analysis of Threats Motivating DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM), Damon, 2006/09/27
    - [ietf-dkim] Re: RFC 4686 on Analysis of Threats Motivating DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM), Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/27
[ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/26
RE: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP -Suggestion to Remove this., Bill.Oxley, 2006/09/26
RE: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Arvel Hathcock, 2006/09/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP -Suggestion to Remove this., Hector Santos, 2006/09/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Michael Thomas, 2006/09/26
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Wietse Venema, 2006/09/26
- RE: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Arvel Hathcock, 2006/09/26
- RE: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Arvel Hathcock, 2006/09/26
[ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Hector Santos, 2006/09/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/26
  - [ietf-dkim] Re: New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/26
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/26
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Hector Santos, 2006/09/26
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Damon, 2006/09/26
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this., Damon, 2006/09/26
Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Negative Commentary corrections, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/22
- Message not available
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Negative Commentary corrections, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/22
RE: [ietf-dkim] Old issue: What is the role of SSP?, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/09/22
[ietf-dkim] Suggested text for more intuitive parameter descriptors, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/09/22
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Suggested text for more intuitive parameter descriptors, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/22
[ietf-dkim] quick summary of Sep 21 jabber, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/21
- Message not available
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] quick summary of Sep 21 jabber, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber server?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/21
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Jabber server?, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/22
[ietf-dkim] New issue: Definition of "DKIM Signer Complete", Arvel Hathcock, 2006/09/21
- Message not available
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Definition of "DKIM Signer Complete", Damon, 2006/09/21
    - jabber problems (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Definition of "DKIM Signer Complete"), Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/22
    - Re: jabber problems (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Definition of "DKIM Signer Complete"), John Levine, 2006/09/22
    - Message not available
    - [ietf-dkim] Re: jabber problems, John L, 2006/09/22
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: jabber problems, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/22
    - Message not available
    - [ietf-dkim] Re: jabber problems, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/22
[ietf-dkim] Jabber server problem..., Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/21
[ietf-dkim] DKIM issues, Eliot Lear, 2006/09/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM issues, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/21
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/21
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue, Eliot Lear, 2006/09/21
  - RE: [ietf-dkim] New Issue 5.3 we never send mail, Bill.Oxley, 2006/09/21
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/21
    - [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/22
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue, Damon, 2006/09/22
    - [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/22
[ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Negative Commentary corrections, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: ssp-requirements-01 // Designated Signing Domain Scenario missing, Jim Fenton, 2006/09/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Jim Fenton, 2006/09/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Michael Thomas, 2006/09/21
  - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Michael Thomas, 2006/09/21
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Michael Thomas, 2006/09/21
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Michael Thomas, 2006/09/21
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Michael Thomas, 2006/09/21
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/22
[ietf-dkim] New Issue: Generic requirements for SSP, v1., Dave Crocker, 2006/09/20
[ietf-dkim] New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/20
- [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/20
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/21
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/21
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/21
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/21
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/21
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/22
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/22
[ietf-dkim] New Issue: Discover "requirement", Dave Crocker, 2006/09/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/20
[ietf-dkim] New Issue: Clarity among the usage scenarios, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/20
[ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP?, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/20
- RE: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP?, Bill.Oxley, 2006/09/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP?, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/20
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP?, Jim Fenton, 2006/09/20
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP?, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Tim Draegen, 2006/09/20
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Jim Fenton, 2006/09/20
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/21
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/21
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/21
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5} {3.5}, Tim Draegen, 2006/09/21
    - RE: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5} {3.5}, Bill.Oxley, 2006/09/21
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5} {3.5}, Hector Santos, 2006/09/21
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5} {3.5}, J.D. Falk, 2006/09/21
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5} {3.5}, Tim Draegen, 2006/09/21
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5} {3.5}, Hector Santos, 2006/09/21
    - [ietf-dkim] Old issue: What is the role of SSP?, John Levine, 2006/09/21
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Old issue: What is the role of SSP?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/22
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Old issue: What is the role of SSP?, Hector Santos, 2006/09/22
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Old issue: What is the role of SSP?, Hector Santos, 2006/09/22
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Old issue: What is the role of SSP?, Hector Santos, 2006/09/22
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5} {3.5}, Steve Atkins, 2006/09/21
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/21
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/21
    - [ietf-dkim] Re: New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5}, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/22
{Blocked Content} [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, 2006/09/19
[ietf-dkim] Jabber meeting Thursday 1500 UTC, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/19
[ietf-dkim] tracker/jabber info, Tim Draegen, 2006/09/19
- [ietf-dkim] Re: tracker/jabber info, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/19
[ietf-dkim] requrements-01 available, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/15
- [ietf-dkim] Re: requrements-01 available, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requrements-01 available, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/16
  - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] requrements-01// security concerns regarding policy domain designations rather than delegations, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/18
  - Message not available
    - [ietf-dkim] Re: requrements-01// security concerns regarding policy domain designations rather than delegations, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/18
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: requrements-01// security concerns regarding policy domain designations rather than delegations, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/19
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: requrements-01// security concerns regarding policy domain designations rather than delegations, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/19
    - [ietf-dkim] Re: requrements-01// security concerns regarding policy domain designations rather than delegations, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/19
    - Message not available
    - [ietf-dkim] Re: requrements-01// security concerns regarding policy domain designations rather than delegations, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/19
Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/11
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Jeff Macdonald, 2006/09/13
[ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/11
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Hector Santos, 2006/09/11
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, wayne, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Steve Atkins, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Hector Santos, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Steve Atkins, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Hector Santos, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Steve Atkins, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Hector Santos, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Steve Atkins, 2006/09/11
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/11
  - RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Bill.Oxley, 2006/09/11
    - RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Hector Santos, 2006/09/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Graham Murray, 2006/09/12
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, John Levine, 2006/09/12
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/12
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, John L, 2006/09/12
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/11
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/12
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/12
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists, Hector Santos, 2006/09/12
RE: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/09/09
- [ietf-dkim] house analogy, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/09
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/09
  - RE: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, John L, 2006/09/09
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, John L, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/09
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, John Levine, 2006/09/09
RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/09/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/09
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, John Levine, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, John Levine, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/09
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/09
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, Steve Atkins, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, John Levine, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, Jeff Macdonald, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE, william(at)elan.net, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/12
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/12
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Damon, 2006/09/12
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/12
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/12
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/12
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/12
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/12
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/12
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/12
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Preventing spoofs without breaking SMTP, Hector Santos, 2006/09/12
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Damon, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/11
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/09/12
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/09/12
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/12
[ietf-dkim] Algortihm transitions, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/07
RE: tree walking (was - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/06
- RE: tree walking (was - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), Bill.Oxley, 2006/09/06
- Re: tree walking (was - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), Jim Fenton, 2006/09/07
[ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/06
- Message not available
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Damon, 2006/09/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Jon Callas, 2006/09/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/06
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, J.D. Falk, 2006/09/06
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Jim Fenton, 2006/09/06
    - tree walking (was - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), william(at)elan.net, 2006/09/06
    - Re: tree walking (was - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), Jim Fenton, 2006/09/06
    - Re: tree walking (was - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), william(at)elan.net, 2006/09/07
    - Re: tree walking (was - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), Jim Fenton, 2006/09/07
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/06
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/06
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, John Levine, 2006/09/06
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/07
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Jim Fenton, 2006/09/07
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp (let me review), Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/07
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, John L, 2006/09/07
    - [ietf-dkim] Re: user level ssp, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/07
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/07
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/07
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Jim Fenton, 2006/09/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/06
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, J.D. Falk, 2006/09/06
    - RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Bill.Oxley, 2006/09/06
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/06
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/06
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/06
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/07
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/07
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/07
  - RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/07
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, John Levine, 2006/09/07
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/07
    - [ietf-dkim] Re: user level ssp, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/07
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: user level ssp, J.D. Falk, 2006/09/07
  - RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Bill.Oxley, 2006/09/07
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/07
    - RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Bill.Oxley, 2006/09/07
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, John Levine, 2006/09/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/07
  - RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/09/07
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/09
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/07
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Steve Atkins, 2006/09/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/07
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Steve Atkins, 2006/09/07
    - [ietf-dkim] Sign it all, publish the policy, and trust the policy., Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, wayne, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, wayne, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, John Levine, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, wayne, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] we don't know what SSP means, John Levine, 2006/09/10
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] we don't know what SSP means, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/10
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] we don't know what SSP means, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/10
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] we don't know what SSP means, Michael Thomas, 2006/09/10
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] we don't know what SSP means, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/10
    - [ietf-dkim] SSP Policies and SSP-02 Comments, Hector Santos, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] we don't know what SSP means, Jim Fenton, 2006/09/11
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hector Santos, 2006/09/10
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hector Santos, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, wayne, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/11
    - Message not available
    - [ietf-dkim] Relaxed always (was: user level ssp), Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/11
  - Self-assertion of...well, anything at all (was Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp), J.D. Falk, 2006/09/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Thomas A. Fine, 2006/09/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/08
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, John Levine, 2006/09/08
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/08
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, Damon, 2006/09/08
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] The basic problem with SSP, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/09
    - [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Wietse Venema, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/09
    - RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Bill.Oxley, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Dave Crocker, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/09
    - [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Steve Atkins, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/09
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, J.D. Falk, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos, 2006/09/11
    - accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION), J.D. Falk, 2006/09/11
    - Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos, 2006/09/11
    - Message not available
    - Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos, 2006/09/11
    - Message not available
    - Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos, 2006/09/11
    - Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Steve Atkins, 2006/09/11
    - Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/11
    - Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Steve Atkins, 2006/09/11
    - [ietf-dkim] Reputation vs SSP, Hector Santos, 2006/09/11
    - [ietf-dkim] Using Reputation with DKIM-BASE - Its really not out of scope., Hector Santos, 2006/09/11
    - Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), J.D. Falk, 2006/09/11
    - Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos, 2006/09/11
    - Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), J.D. Falk, 2006/09/12
    - Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP=FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos, 2006/09/12
    - Message not available
    - Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re:[ietf-dkim]SSP=FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos, 2006/09/13
    - Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP=FAILURE DETECTION), J.D. Falk, 2006/09/13
    - Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/11
    - Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), John Levine, 2006/09/11
    - [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/11
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Steve Atkins, 2006/09/11
    - [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/11
[ietf-dkim] Policy vs Practices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Policy vs Practices, Hector Santos, 2006/09/05
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Policy vs Practices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/05
  - Re: [ietf-dkim] Policy vs Practices, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/05
[ietf-dkim] Feature matrix, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/05
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Feature matrix, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/05
[ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/04
  - [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/05
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, Damon, 2006/09/06
    - Message not available
    - Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, Damon, 2006/09/06
    - [ietf-dkim] Requirement to explain Resent-* (was: Additional per user policy requirments), Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, Scott Kitterman, 2006/09/06
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/06
  - RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, william(at)elan.net, 2006/09/06
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/09/06
[ietf-dkim] Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-allman-dkim-ssp-02.txt], Frank Ellermann, 2006/09/01
Re: [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-allman-dkim-ssp-02.txt], Stephen Farrell, 2006/09/01