On 6 Sep 2006, at 10:14 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
All of this talk about additional requirements for user level ssp
ignores
the basic question: should there be any requirements for user level
SSP
at all? If so, what are the use cases? I'm not terribly convinced
that even
that has consensus -- this is the first that I even recall the
subject being
raised.
I think user-level *anything* with DKIM is a bad idea. There's a lot
of flexibility in the system that permits someone so inclined to get
to something within epsilon of user-level whatevers. However, putting
it into the system is not a good idea.
Jon
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html