Frank Ellermann wrote:
Eliot Lear wrote:
If you have more, please send a note to this mailing list
with the subject "New Issue".
See <mid:450B50F4(_dot_)6BEF(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> posted in reply
to the announcement (requrements-01 available) 2006-09-13:
<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.dkim/6034>
<news://news.gmane.org/450B50F4(_dot_)6BEF(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de>
Except from typos that was:
5.4: Are (1) and (3) in conflict ? Maybe join (1)+(3).
That seems like a good idea.
5.3 (2): IIRC we've identified "never send mail" as a special
case of "strict", and then just not sending mail, let
alone signing it. IMO you can delete this point.
I think that this subject has been pretty well beaten to death, but I do
really believe that there is utility to differentiating the two: I'm very
likely to reject a piece of mail out of hand if I receive one with the
ssp set to "I don't send mail". If it was just "strict", I can see reasons
why you might want to be more careful.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html