ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

[ietf-dkim] New Issue

2006-09-21 02:54:50
Eliot Lear wrote:
 
If you have more, please send a note to this mailing list
with the subject "New Issue".

See <mid:450B50F4(_dot_)6BEF(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> posted in reply
to the announcement (requrements-01 available) 2006-09-13:
<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.dkim/6034>
<news://news.gmane.org/450B50F4(_dot_)6BEF(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de>

Except from typos that was:

5.4:      Are (1) and (3) in conflict ?  Maybe join (1)+(3).
          I dont's see the MUST in (4), it's a "nice to have".

5.3  (2): IIRC we've identified "never send mail" as a special
          case of "strict", and then just not sending mail, let
          alone signing it.  IMO you can delete this point.

Frank


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>