Dave Crocker wrote:
Michael Thomas wrote:
I think that the interesting meta issue here is that DKIM
verification does not require this; SSP requires this. I hope that
there isn't confusion about that because the two really are
severable.
I am glad you raised this. It encourages the basic question about the
relationship between SSP and DKIM?
For example, are there reasonable SSP features that do not involve
DKIM at all. (Answer, "I send no mail" is a prime example.)
Note that "I send no mail" has nothing to do with signing, in which
case, the middle S of SSP is overly constraining.
Right, but by the same token I don't think we want to be in ocean boiling
mode either. But let's talk about the concrete: is there something other
than
"I don't send mail" in the non-dkim category that should be on our agenda?
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html