John Levine wrote:
- If SSP is going to be something other than an ignored add-on,
then SSP-req/DKIM-base needs to have language ...
No way.
I'd be with John there for purely process reasons - I'd like to
see base as an RFC and adding any normative SSP reference would
set that back by months at least.
S.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html