----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Farrell" <stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie>
John Levine wrote:
- If SSP is going to be something other than an
ignored add-on, then SSP-req/DKIM-base needs
to have language ...
No way.
I'd be with John there for purely process reasons - I'd like to
see base as an RFC and adding any normative SSP reference would
set that back by months at least.
If there is a long run benefit to "doing it right" (not saying it is), "by
months" would be inconsequential to the majority of "mankind" (Internet
Email Industry - across the board).
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html