On 2006-09-21 12:49, Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com wrote:
In sum, I think the SSP-req doc should say "SSP must be published
by DKIM signers, and the format is <this>".
Disagree, dkim base works now. There will be people that will move very
slowly into implementation and requiring SSP to be implemented at the
same time will slow adoption.
+1
Saying essentially that "confused people will be confused" isn't enough
of a reason to mandate something. They'll be confused anyway.
--
J.D. Falk, Anti-Spam Product Manager
Yahoo! Communications Platform Team
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html