Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP= FAILURE DETECTION)
2006-09-12 11:57:01
On 2006-09-11 18:54, Hector Santos wrote:
If there a consistent ACCEPT, DENY and DELIVERY DECISIONS method
so that when XYZ.COM sends signed mail to users at YAHOO.COM and
AOL.COM, you don't get inconsistent results?
Could you rephrase the question?
Sorry, that should of started with "Is there...."
In short, what I wrote above with a domain achieving different DKIM-BASE
results depending on which DKIM-BASE only systems it sends its mail to.
So, you're concerned that senders won't be able to know beforehand how
their mail will be received? DKIM seems like a very poor tool to affect
that particular common complaint.
Also you're still thinking only as a sender, not as a receiver or an
intermediary. SMTP (and everything built on top of it) is a
conversation, not an announcement.
--
J.D. Falk, Anti-Spam Product Manager
Yahoo! Communications Platform Team
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), (continued)
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos
- Message not available
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos
- Message not available
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Steve Atkins
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Scott Kitterman
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Steve Atkins
- [ietf-dkim] Reputation vs SSP, Hector Santos
- [ietf-dkim] Using Reputation with DKIM-BASE - Its really not out of scope., Hector Santos
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), J.D. Falk
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP= FAILURE DETECTION),
J.D. Falk <=
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP=FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos
- Message not available
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re:[ietf-dkim]SSP=FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP=FAILURE DETECTION), J.D. Falk
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Scott Kitterman
- Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), John Levine
- [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Frank Ellermann
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Steve Atkins
- [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Frank Ellermann
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION, Hector Santos |
Next by Date: |
Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP=FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP= FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos |
Next by Thread: |
Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re: [ietf-dkim]SSP=FAILURE DETECTION), Hector Santos |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|