Steve Atkins wrote:
The cynic in me says that the sole purpose of SSP is to
affect the deployment of DKIM.
And the sole purpose of DKIM is to accelerate SpamCop's
report generation... <gd&r>
Or at least make it more accurate. That is _one_ of the
goals of DKIM, and one it's likely to fulfill, I think.
Yes, I can't tell if SC already uses DKIM for this purpose.
Similarly for feedback loops from some large ISPs.
And with less complications.
Note, though, that I didn't say whether SSP would affect DKIM
deployment positively or negatively - I suspect views on that
would differ wildly. :)
I'll wait until I see more drafts with an "approved" stamp. If
DKIM boils down to "use crypto to protect your timestamp line",
is it just another way to emulate reverse paths without using
reverse paths ?
Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html