ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: accept, deny, or other delivery decisions (was Re:[ietf-dkim]SSP=FAILURE DETECTION)

2006-09-13 04:40:12

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Douglas Otis" <dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org>
To: "Hector Santos" <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>

It is because of that inconsistent DKIM reception handling unknowns
between different systems, we risk encouraging DKIM bad actors to
proliferate against the new creation of different potential targets.

In summary, the concern is that there is a risk when you don't have a
common DKIM-BASE handling concept.

Could you give a simple example of this risk?  Please be brief.

Real world example - DNSRBL

-- 
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com





_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>