heard of is more aimed at securing things like
statements(_at_)bigbank(_dot_)com without
having to say "I sign everything" for the entire domain which is assumedly a
lot harder. The thing about this is that you can alternately set up a record
for statements(_at_)accounts(_dot_)bigbank(_dot_)com or somesuch which would work the same way.
I've heard it expressed that that is problematic for some people, but I
frankly don't remember why at this point.
I think it's a problem for banks that signed up for the $2.99/mo DNS
hosting service and can't afford to switch to the $7.99 version.
R's,
John
"Save at the Sign of the Sock"
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html