My problem (although much smaller in scale at this time) exactly
Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications, Inc.
Alpharetta GA
404-847-6397
bill(_dot_)oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of J.D. Falk
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 5:18 PM
To: IETF-DKIM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp
On 2006-09-06 14:12, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
Since you can wildcard the most common case one would need 50,000 SSP
records at most. It is likely that they would be generated
automatically as individual mail servers were configured to use DKIM.
BITs are cheap. I see no problem in deploying 100,000 DKIM records in
such a situation.
How will that scale to the 219,000,000 users that comScore thought
Yahoo! Mail had about a year ago?
(The actual number is a trade secret, but comScore's close enough for
this conversation.)
And, have any actual banks actually asked for this, or is it still
entirely theoretical?
--
J.D. Falk, Anti-Spam Product Manager
Yahoo! Communications Platform Team
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html