ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp

2006-09-06 15:14:26
My problem (although much smaller in scale at this time) exactly

Bill Oxley 
Messaging Engineer 
Cox Communications, Inc. 
Alpharetta GA 
404-847-6397 
bill(_dot_)oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com 


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of J.D. Falk
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 5:18 PM
To: IETF-DKIM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp

On 2006-09-06 14:12, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

Since you can wildcard the most common case one would need 50,000 SSP
records at most. It is likely that they would be generated
automatically as individual mail servers were configured to use DKIM.

BITs are cheap. I see no problem in deploying 100,000 DKIM records in
such a situation.

How will that scale to the 219,000,000 users that comScore thought 
Yahoo! Mail had about a year ago?

(The actual number is a trade secret, but comScore's close enough for 
this conversation.)

And, have any actual banks actually asked for this, or is it still 
entirely theoretical?

-- 
J.D. Falk, Anti-Spam Product Manager
Yahoo! Communications Platform Team
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>