1st case I sign no mail, It means that if you receive a signed message
from me I am amenable to you discarding it unread. In the case that I am
a 3rd party signer, the domain setup to do that signing would have a
separate administrative domain for exchanging email about the signing
domain. Example I help administrate cox.net but all emails concerning
that administration go thru cox.com.
2nd case is from offline discussions that revolved about legal
accountability of DKIM.
Thanks,
Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications, Inc.
Alpharetta GA
404-847-6397
bill(_dot_)oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Crocker [mailto:dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 10:58 AM
To: Oxley, Bill (CCI-Atlanta)
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp
Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com wrote:
I sign no mail==I only sign other peoples mail (third party signer)
No, it does not mean that.
To the extent that it is, nonetheless, what you want it to mean, what
problem does it solve? You sign other peoples' mail. So what? How
does publishing that information solve a demonstrated need?
I sign some mail==I sign some mail from my domain but don't want to be
sued for you getting unsigned spam purportedly from me.
So, now we are trying to have SSP solve legal problems? For which
jurisdictions?
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html