RE: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp

Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> No it doesn't.
Ok.  You're right.  I see it now.

The problem is that I keep thinking that validating keys that can be
used for signing should flow from the policy.  Whereas DKIM has this
idea that if a key exists, it implies a policy.  It seems workable on
the surface, but it seems to me that a policy-first solution would be
better.

         tom

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html