[ietf-dkim] Re: Suggested text for more intuitive parameter descriptors

Arvel Hathcock wrote:

> For example, p=! would be better represented as p=strict.
 
> Is this ok?
The text is fine, but wasting bytes while talking about DNS
strikes me as bad idea.  After a few more iterations in this
direction we'd get XML-over-DNS CallerID again... <shudder />

Frank


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html