Frank Ellermann wrote:
Dave Crocker wrote:
or what?
It's about mail with one or more Resent-From or Resent-Sender
header fields as far as I'm concerned.
all of the discussion about signing by Alice is irrelevant,
since the later focus seems to be on signing by the
re-poster, Bob.
Whatever SSP does (and the more interesting case is a "Bob" who
is completely DKIM-unaware), the mail should not be rejected
by the next receiver(s) no matter what Alice's SSP says. Bob
is perfectly entitled to resend a mail he got using the header
fields specified in STD 11 or 2822.
Where "reject" is of course the least problematic outcome, but
"annotate as suspicious", the weasel words for "delete", would
be wrong.
I agree, and I'd appreciate some help on how to make this clear. The
corresponding requirement is actually in the form of a negative in
requirement #12.
Maybe I just need some forward references in the scenarios to the
fundamental corresponding requirements?
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html