Major +1
--
Arvel
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Michael Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 8:58 AM
To: Wietse Venema
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE DETECTION
Wietse Venema wrote:
What was the advantage of SSP with look-alike domains?
To find large unproductive ratholes? Neither DKIM or SSP claim to have
any direct effect on look-alike domain names, and there's nothing in our
charter that says that we'll be doing anything about that ever. DKIM/SSP
are two pieces for a much larger set of things that need to come together
to combat phishing including software layered on top of thse base
authentication
mechanisms, user base training/human factors, and law enforcement -- most of
which will not have any IETF involvement at all. No amount of hand-wringing
here is likely to tell us how this will ultimately play out.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html