On 14-Nov-2006, at 17:03, Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 4:17 PM +0100 11/14/06, Joe Abley wrote:
For the benefit of those who do not follow dnsext closely, what
friction do you expect?
As Eric stated in his message, we should not rehash old arguments.
This has been beaten to death on the DKIM WG mailing list. As
expected, different people had different (and, in this case,
strongly-held) views, but consensus was reached and agreed to by
the AD and with the DNS folks.
Indeed, I wasn't attempting to rehash an old argument specifically
about DKIM.
I rather thought that the general difficulties (perceived, actual, or
otherwise) might be worth enumerating in a more general forum so that
they are better-known. I doubt DKIM is the last work which will
feature new types of data being stored in the DNS.
Joe
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf