IETF DKIM (date)
November 30, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] new issue: requirement to enumerate receiver side benefits of SSP?, Steve Atkins, 11:01
- RE: [ietf-dkim] new issue: requirement to enumerate receiver side benefits of SSP?, Bill.Oxley, 10:54
- [ietf-dkim] new issue: requirement to enumerate receiver side benefits of SSP?, Michael Thomas, 10:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] new issue: clarify i= vs. SSP, Dave Crocker, 09:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Michael Thomas, 09:17
- [ietf-dkim] Re: new issue: clarify i= vs. SSP, Frank Ellermann, 08:31
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Bill.Oxley, 08:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Scott Kitterman, 05:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Charles Lindsey, 04:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Charles Lindsey, 04:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Charles Lindsey, 03:57
November 29, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] new issue: clarify i= vs. SSP, Michael Thomas, 14:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Eliot Lear, 12:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Damon, 11:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, william(at)elan.net, 09:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Role of Sender header as signing domain, Stephen Farrell, 07:56
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Future uses of DKIM in Netnews (was: "Isigneverything" yes/no), Bill.Oxley, 07:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Scott Kitterman, 06:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Role of Sender header as signing domain, Hector Santos, 05:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Future uses of DKIM in Netnews (was: "I signeverything" yes/no), Charles Lindsey, 05:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Eliot Lear, 04:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Role of Sender header as signing domain, Charles Lindsey, 04:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Charles Lindsey, 04:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Charles Lindsey, 03:47
November 28, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Michael Thomas, 12:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Scott Kitterman, 11:42
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Future uses of DKIM in Netnews (was: "I signeverything" yes/no), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:08
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Frank Ellermann, 10:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Hector Santos, 10:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Damon, 10:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Michael Thomas, 09:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Michael Thomas, 09:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Role of Sender header as signing domain, Steve Atkins, 09:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Role of Sender header as signing domain, John Levine, 08:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Scott Kitterman, 08:55
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain, Frank Ellermann, 08:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Hector Santos, 07:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Role of Sender header as signing domain, Hector Santos, 07:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Eliot Lear, 06:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] incremental vs. infrastructure adoption, Charles Lindsey, 06:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Role of Sender header as signing domain, Scott Kitterman, 06:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Charles Lindsey, 06:10
- [ietf-dkim] Role of Sender header as signing domain, Charles Lindsey, 05:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Future uses of DKIM in Netnews (was: "I sign everything" yes/no), Charles Lindsey, 04:18
November 27, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Hector Santos, 10:46
- [ietf-dkim] Future uses of DKIM in Netnews (was: "I sign everything" yes/no), Frank Ellermann, 09:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Stephen Farrell, 07:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Charles Lindsey, 07:39
- [ietf-dkim] News FYI - Insider Threats, Hector Santos, 07:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Charles Lindsey, 07:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Stephen Farrell, 06:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Charles Lindsey, 06:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Charles Lindsey, 05:06
November 26, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Jim Fenton, 18:48
- [ietf-dkim] Resend-cruft (was: ISSUE: Better definition of"DKIM signing complete" required), Frank Ellermann, 15:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Hector Santos, 14:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Hector Santos, 13:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of"DKIM signing complete" required, Hector Santos, 12:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: news and lists again, was "I sign everything" yes/no, John Levine, 09:19
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:29
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Frank Ellermann, 03:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Eliot Lear, 02:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Eliot Lear, 02:07
November 24, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Jim Fenton, 23:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Jim Fenton, 22:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, John Levine, 20:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Hector Santos, 20:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signingcomplete" required, Hector Santos, 19:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIMsigning complete" required, Hector Santos, 18:10
- Re: Issue 1382 (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type), Cullen Jennings, 18:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signingcomplete"required, Hector Santos, 17:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, william(at)elan.net, 14:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Charles Lindsey, 14:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Charles Lindsey, 14:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Charles Lindsey, 14:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Charles Lindsey, 13:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Charles Lindsey, 13:45
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Frank Ellermann, 10:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Michael Thomas, 09:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Eliot Lear, 09:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete"required, Stephen Farrell, 09:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Stephen Farrell, 09:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Charles Lindsey, 09:15
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Is "sender" in 4.1 4th paragraph okay / what happens with Alice's SSP in 5.3, Frank Ellermann, 09:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete"required, Charles Lindsey, 09:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Stephen Farrell, 08:45
- [ietf-dkim] Last calls for lemonade (was: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required), Frank Ellermann, 08:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Stephen Farrell, 08:27
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Frank Ellermann, 08:27
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Frank Ellermann, 08:05
- [ietf-dkim] EAI + SSP status (was: "I sign everything" yes/no), Frank Ellermann, 07:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Stephen Farrell, 07:50
- [ietf-dkim] OT: Return-Path considerations (was: "I sign everything" yes/no), Frank Ellermann, 07:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Hector Santos, 07:22
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Frank Ellermann, 06:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Hector Santos, 06:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Hector Santos, 05:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Hector Santos, 05:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Stephen Farrell, 05:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete"required, Hector Santos, 05:12
- [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Frank Ellermann, 04:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Charles Lindsey, 04:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Hector Santos, 04:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Stephen Farrell, 04:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Charles Lindsey, 04:19
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Frank Ellermann, 04:15
November 23, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Hector Santos, 19:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Hector Santos, 17:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Charles Lindsey, 12:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Hector Santos, 12:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Charles Lindsey, 08:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required, Stephen Farrell, 07:08
November 22, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Better definition of "DKIM signing complete" required (was: "I sign everything" yes/no), Frank Ellermann, 13:40
- RE: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" yes/no, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Hector Santos, 10:45
- [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" yes/no, Frank Ellermann, 09:41
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Stephen Farrell, 06:04
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Pekka Savola, 05:55
November 21, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" yes/no, Hector Santos, 21:05
- RE: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" yes/no, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" yes/no, Paul Hoffman, 16:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" yes/no, Hector Santos, 16:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" yes/no, Dave Crocker, 16:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" yes/no, Stephen Farrell, 16:25
- [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" yes/no, J.D. Falk, 16:07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:44
November 20, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Robert Elz, 22:17
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Stephen Farrell, 15:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Dave Crocker, 14:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Robert Elz, 14:21
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:34
- [ietf-dkim] RE: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' toProposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:14
November 17, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Hector Santos, 15:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Charles Lindsey, 14:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Charles Lindsey, 14:09
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Frank Ellermann, 13:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Wietse Venema, 08:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Wietse Venema, 08:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Michael Thomas, 07:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Steve Atkins, 07:31
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Frank Ellermann, 06:44
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Frank Ellermann, 06:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Wietse Venema, 05:32
November 16, 2006
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 23:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, John Levine, 23:02
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 22:23
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Olaf M. Kolkman, 08:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Scott Kitterman, 07:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Scott Kitterman, 07:11
November 15, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Arvel Hathcock, 15:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Steve Atkins, 12:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, John Glube, 12:39
- [ietf-dkim] Pseudocode processing algorithm, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Policy decision tree outcomes, Stephen Farrell, 07:44
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Policy decision tree outcomes, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:34
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Policy decision tree outcomes, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Policy decision tree outcomes, Charles Lindsey, 04:57
November 14, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Tony Hansen, 20:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Policy decision tree outcomes, Stephen Farrell, 19:12
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Dave Crocker, 12:08
- Don't ignore (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] test -- ignore), Dave Crocker, 11:56
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Policy decision tree outcomes, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:02
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Joe Abley, 09:16
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Paul Hoffman, 09:11
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Joe Abley, 08:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Policy decision tree outcomes, Charles Lindsey, 06:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] incremental vs. infrastructure adoption, Charles Lindsey, 05:51
November 13, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, John Levine, 23:19
- [ietf-dkim] test -- ignore, Dave Crocker, 22:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Steve Atkins, 15:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Michael Thomas, 15:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Stephen Farrell, 15:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Steve Atkins, 15:08
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Eric Allman, 15:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, wayne, 14:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Michael Thomas, 14:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Steve Atkins, 14:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Steve Atkins, 14:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Stephen Farrell, 14:14
- [ietf-dkim] Policy decision tree outcomes, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Dave Crocker, 14:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Steve Atkins, 13:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Charles Lindsey, 13:06
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Frank Ellermann, 13:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Steve Atkins, 10:48
- [ietf-dkim] incremental vs. infrastructure adoption, Dave Crocker, 09:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Charles Lindsey, 08:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Stephen Farrell, 08:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, John Levine, 00:22
November 12, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, wayne, 22:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, John Levine, 18:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Scott Kitterman, 17:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Dave Crocker, 14:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Scott Kitterman, 13:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Dave Crocker, 13:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Jim Fenton, 12:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, John Levine, 12:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Stephen Farrell, 10:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, David Sanchez, 09:43
November 11, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Steve Atkins, 16:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, David Sanchez, 14:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Michael Thomas, 13:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, John Levine, 13:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Dave Crocker, 13:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Steve Atkins, 13:00
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Bill.Oxley, 12:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, John Levine, 11:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Charles Lindsey, 05:31
November 10, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Powers, Jot, 12:49
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Frank Ellermann, 10:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Michael Thomas, 10:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP to subdomains, John Levine, 09:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Michael Thomas, 09:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, John Levine, 09:46
- [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Applicability of SSP to subdomains, Frank Ellermann, 09:29
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Frank Ellermann, 09:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Dave Crocker, 09:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Dave Crocker, 09:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Dave Crocker, 08:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Jeff Macdonald, 08:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP to subdomains, Michael Thomas, 08:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Michael Thomas, 08:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Charles Lindsey, 07:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Charles Lindsey, 04:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Charles Lindsey, 04:29
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP to subdomains, Jim Fenton, 00:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Jim Fenton, 00:34
November 09, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Stephen Farrell, 13:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, John Levine, 13:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Michael Thomas, 13:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP is the Sender Signing Practices, not the Sender's accreditation, Michael Thomas, 12:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Dave Crocker, 12:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP is the Sender Signing Practices, not the Sender's accreditation, Dave Crocker, 11:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP is the Sender Signing Practices, not the Sender's accreditation, wayne, 11:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Steve Atkins, 11:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP is the Sender Signing Practices, not the Sender's accreditation, Michael Thomas, 10:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP is the Sender Signing Practices, not the Sender's accreditation, Michael Thomas, 10:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Michael Thomas, 10:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Dave Crocker, 10:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP is the Sender Signing Practices, not the Sender's accreditation, Michael Thomas, 10:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP is the Sender Signing Practices, not the Sender's accreditation, John R Levine, 10:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP is the Sender Signing Practices, not the Sender's accreditation, Steve Atkins, 10:21
- [ietf-dkim] SSP is the Sender Signing Practices, not the Sender's accreditation, wayne, 10:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Jeff Macdonald, 09:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Steve Atkins, 09:32
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Frank Ellermann, 09:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Dave Crocker, 09:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Dave Crocker, 08:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Michael Thomas, 08:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Dave Crocker, 08:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Steve Atkins, 08:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Wietse Venema, 07:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Scott Kitterman, 06:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Charles Lindsey, 05:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Graham Murray, 02:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, John Levine, 00:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, John Levine, 00:27
November 08, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Scott Kitterman, 21:27
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM wg summary for SAAG, Stephen Farrell, 15:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Steve Atkins, 09:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Scott Kitterman, 09:47
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Bill.Oxley, 09:46
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Frank Ellermann, 09:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, John Levine, 09:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Steve Atkins, 09:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Powers, Jot, 08:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Charles Lindsey, 05:33
November 07, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, wayne, 21:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, wayne, 21:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Scott Kitterman, 21:12
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Patrick Peterson, 20:55
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Tony Hansen, 20:50
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), DKIM Chair, 20:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Powers, Jot, 20:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Scott Kitterman, 19:11
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Pekka Savola, 15:17
- [ietf-dkim] dkim.org/ietf-dkim.html updated, Dave Crocker, 10:59
- [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements, Patrick Peterson, 00:21
November 06, 2006
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: I-D ACTION: draft-ietf-dkim-overview-02.txt, Bill.Oxley, 16:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: I-D ACTION: draft-ietf-dkim-overview-02.txt, John Levine, 16:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-02.txt, stephen . farrell, 15:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: DKIM and 8 bit data, Arvel Hathcock, 14:32
- [ietf-dkim] Re: DKIM and 8 bit data, John Levine, 08:53
- Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Introducing myself, Charles Lindsey, 03:52