In reply to Joe Abley, Dave Crocer wrote:
I rather thought that the general difficulties (perceived, actual,
or otherwise) might be worth enumerating in a more general forum
so that they are better-known. I doubt DKIM is the last work which
will feature new types of data being stored in the DNS.
This is probably a topic worthy of further discussion, for exactly
the reason you cite. It is an issue that keeps coming up and keeps
causing significant debate. I do not know what it will take to put
the issue fully to rest, but it seems clear to me that it needs a
focused discussion and effort.
Possibly not on the IETF list. I don't know what the right venue is.
See:
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dnsext/draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis/
It is post working group last call, but not at IESG quite yet.
--Olaf
-----------------------------------------------------------
Olaf M. Kolkman
NLnet Labs
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf