[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Role of Sender header as signing domain

2006-11-28 09:04:17

On Nov 28, 2006, at 7:39 AM, John Levine wrote:

That is fair comment, but there seem to be an awful lot of people still
discussing the Role of Sender (and even List-ID and Return-Path) as
possible signing domains.

OK, this is a petition for reopening this Issue.


It's a feature that the signing domain isn't tied to other headers,
not a bug.



NOTE WELL: This list operates according to