On Nov 28, 2006, at 7:39 AM, John Levine wrote:
That is fair comment, but there seem to be an awful lot of people
still
discussing the Role of Sender (and even List-ID and Return-Path) as
possible signing domains.
OK, this is a petition for reopening this Issue.
-1
It's a feature that the signing domain isn't tied to other headers,
not a bug.
Agreed.
Cheers,
Steve
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html