On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:15:21 -0000, Hector Santos <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Charles Lindsey wrote:
That is fair comment, but there seem to be an awful lot of people still
discussing the Role of Sender (and even List-ID and Return-Path) as
possible signing domains.
Why are you stuck on Sender? It is not the author or owner of the
message and that is whats important in DKIM.
Usually, the Sender will be the same as (one of) the From(s), or at least
will be from the same domain. But in the few cases where it is not the
MSA, which is where the signing is likely to be done, will probably be
more familiar with the Sender, and able to vouch for him, than with the
From. In other situations, it might be the List-Post rather than the
Sender.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html