On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:42:25 -0000, Eliot Lear <lear(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Charles Lindsey wrote:
I utterly fail to see why what is displayed to the user is of the least
relevance.
Because it's very possible UAs will indicate whether a message is signed
or not. This is already done with various plugins.
In that case the plugin can be arranged to display the Sender, if relevant.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html