ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of Sender header as signing domain

2006-11-28 11:42:16
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 12:36, Frank Ellermann wrote:

In that point I agree with Hector:  The problems of braindead
MUAs are out of scope.  

Except that any solution that starts out with upgrade every MUA in the world 
(except I think GNUs) is probably not going to get much traction.  

The reality is that from an end user perspective 2822.From is the only game in 
town.

Scott K

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>