On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:07:02 -0000, Stephen Farrell
<stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie> wrote:
Charles Lindsey wrote:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 06:25:27 -0000, Jim Fenton <fenton(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>
wrote:
It's not entirely forgotten; section 2.3 of draft-allman-dkim-ssp-02
discusses multiple From addresses. We thought about resolving the
ambiguity by (1) arbitrarily picking the first address in the From
header field, (2) picking the address in the Sender header field, or
(3) querying SSP for all addresses in the From header field, and
combining them somehow. We picked (1), ...
And there I think you picked the wrong one.
Fair enough that you disagree, but the main point though is that
the WG reached rough consensus.
I have seen sufficient comments from others to the effect that the
Sender needs to be looked at in many situations that this matter
probably ought to be reviewed (does that mean raising an Issue?).
No. For base, Barry and I are using a scheme where re-opening a
decided issue (which is what you'd presumably like in this case)
requires N people supporting, for some informally defined, but
increasing, value of N ....
That is fair comment, but there seem to be an awful lot of people still
discussing the Role of Sender (and even List-ID and Return-Path) as
possible signing domains.
OK, this is a petition for reopening this Issue. That gives 1 vote, but
you will need lots more to take action. So I invite anyone else who
supports this view to reply with a +1. If there is insufficient support,
then I will shut up.
Here are a few examples of recent posts which seem to want to explore
these alternatives:
John Glube 15 Nov 2006 14:33:54 -0500
Frank Ellerman 22 Nov 2006 21:24:52 +0100
Hector Santos 24 Nov 2006 09:17:46 -0500
Michael Thomas 24 Nov 2006 08:47:13 -0800
Douglas Otis 27 Nov 2006 14:20:53 -0800
Charles Lindsey 27 Nov 2006 12:53:47 -0000
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html