Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP is the Sender Signing Practices, not the Sender's ac

Michael Thomas wrote:

> > What is the real use case for SSP, in your opinion?
> s/the/a;
>
> ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs:
>
> score SSP_VIOLATION .79

Michael,

The above is so wonderfully precise, concise and cryptic, that I am entirely 
missing your point.
Could I ask you to provide enough text to explain what point you are making and, 
of course, why/how this example makes the point?
d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html