In
<Pine(_dot_)BSI(_dot_)4(_dot_)56(_dot_)0611091216380(_dot_)2782(_at_)tom(_dot_)iecc(_dot_)com>
"John R Levine" <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com> writes:
DKIM, with or without SSP, does not solve the phishing problem, nor
the spam problem. DKIM, in conjunction with one or more reputation
systems, may help here, but this has little to do with SSP.
Right. So we agree that we have yet to show any plausible reason that SSP
would be of use to receivers.
No, I don't agree at all, I never said that and I don't like you
putting words into my mouth.
A tool does not have to completely solve a problem in order for it to
be useful. DKIM and SSP help solve domain forgery problems. This is
a problem made worse by spam and phishing. DKIM, by it self, seems to
only really solve the "who can I blame for sending/relaying this
spam?" problem, something which is already fairly well solved.
Without SSP, I really don't see any use in DKIM at all.
-wayne
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html