ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ietf-dkim] Collection of use cases for SSP requirements

2006-11-07 20:55:24
 
One point I'd like to pull the thread on is the word drop.  
Rather that drop, 
I think it would be better to say reject.  I'm taking the 
word drop to mean 
delete here.
thanks, scott. this is an excellent point and i agree completely.

i found myself constantly resisting the temptation to add technical
accuracy with more precise language at the expense of muddling the core
requirements. this is one area where 'drop' was a poor choice.

pat

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>