william(at)elan.net wrote:
Neither one the designers of DK[IM] are particularly interested in
dealing with as is evident in previous discussions in regards to
"3rd-party" policy considerations or 3rd-party signers.
Your use of "neither one" in this context rather than "none of" implies
there are only two designers, when in fact there are quite a few more.
SSP and DKIM itself are under control of the Working Group. If there is
consensus to do things differently, as there was with the body hash
mechanism in -base, the original designers are likely to contribute
their comments, but it is the WG consensus that rules.
I gather you are advocating a requirement that SSP queries be made for
other addresses in addition to the From address. Doug Otis's draft
suggests this as well. If this is the case, I suggest you ask for an
issue to be opened on the issue tracker requesting the change you have
in mind, such as "SSP should also be queried for the {Sender,
Resent-From, Resent-Sender, List-ID, Reply-To, ...} header fields. It
would be helpful to also explain (1) the benefit of doing so, and (2)
how SSP results from the different header fields should be combined.
-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html