Michael Thomas wrote:
Hector Santos wrote:
It depends on how mixed failure and success is interpreted. DKIM-BASE
says as long as one signature is valid in a multi-signature message, the
message is valid. Failures MUST be ignored as if it was never signed.
There is something not very kosher with that.
That's incorrect. DKIM says nothing about "messages" being valid or not.
Only signatures.
Maybe you should quote "valid"
Look, what in earth are you validating a SIGNATURE for if its not
directly proportional to the validity of the message? Is it just for
show? I hope you are not suggesting that a signature validity is
persistent while you can alter the structure and content of a message.
Lets not go there. OK?
Thanks
---
HLS
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html